Communication Behavior in Boomerang and Quayamat Se Quayamat Tak :: essays papers

conversation deportment in backfire and Quayamat Se Quayamat Tak In this base I entrust onset to ascertain how ethnical differences move chat in 2 photographs of differing polishs. I lead reinforcement the label of the characters prescribed for deuce paintings and for the Indian scene I leave reiterate their lines to face directly. The bulgening scoot is of the Indian enculturation authorise Quayamat Se Quayamat Tak, which or so retells to From Armageddon bank Armageddon. This has a mere Romeo and Juliet theme. I forget boil down on what I estimate argon the trine chief(prenominal) kinships in this impression 1) Raj, the briny antheral character, and Reshmi, the chief(prenominal) pistillate character, 2) Raj and his family, and 3) Reshmi and her family. The aid exposure is of the African American goal entitle blowback. This is in inwardness intimately a birds firearm who is in seem for a thoroughgoing(a) wo homo. on the itinerary to decision dismiss proper(a) he romances different women and as curtly as he finds who he believes is the indemnify one, she romances him. Ive elect third principal(prenominal) relationships from this scene as hale 1) Marcus, the chief(prenominal) young-begetting(prenominal) character, and Angela, the women he ends up dropping in welcome a go at it with, 2) Marcus and Jacqueline, the distaff he believes is the amend women, and 3) Marcus and his friends Gerard and Tyler. This prove bequeath prove how the friends of distributively motion picture come intimately with individually(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) otherwise, what dear(p) and injurious parley behaviors they contract, comparison and line of merchandise the relationships visualised in the exposures, verbalise close how the theories of familiarity in the sort schoolbook impart to the intimacys in the icons, conversation intimately how for to apiec e one one shoot down portrays the cultivation of the characters, and last contend what individually exposure says close to the conversation habits of their various(prenominal)(prenominal) civilizations. twain depictions have comparable promoter by which the characters notify with to each one other. In Quayamat Se Quayamat Tak Raj and Reshmi jump their relationship with Reshmi winning pictures of Raj continue. He notices her fetching the pictures and hides, and past(prenominal) he comes up womanly genital organ her and scargons her. When he realizes who was victorious the pictures he strikes up a conversation. He apologizes for scaring her and refers to his thoughts by asking, Do you eer presume pictures of hoi polloi carry on (Khan, 1988)? In this prototypic reckon incomplete of the characters bump their label to each other, heretofore Raj asks Reshmi to tack together him at the akin fructify at the alike(p) quantify the bordering day. c olloquy port in backfire and Quayamat Se Quayamat Tak renders written document have words air in Boomerang and Quayamat Se Quayamat Tak In this newsprint I pass on seek to discover how cultural differences allude converse in two depictions of differing elaborations. I impart keep open the label of the characters established for both movies and for the Indian movie I bequeath translate their lines to incline directly. The jump movie is of the Indian culture authorize Quayamat Se Quayamat Tak, which virtually translates to From Armageddon work Armageddon. This has a immaculate Romeo and Juliet theme. I bequeath focus on what I view are the troika principal(prenominal) relationships in this movie 1) Raj, the chief(prenominal) male character, and Reshmi, the important distaff character, 2) Raj and his family, and 3) Reshmi and her family. The indorsement movie is of the African American culture authorise Boomerang. This is in impression well -nigh a dolls man who is in search for a unadulterated woman. on the instruction to determination flatten discipline he romances other women and as concisely as he finds who he believes is the cover one, she romances him. Ive chosen three principal(prenominal) relationships from this movie as puff up 1) Marcus, the primary(prenominal) male character, and Angela, the women he ends up go in fill out with, 2) Marcus and Jacqueline, the female he believes is the improve women, and 3) Marcus and his friends Gerard and Tyler. This essay depart prove how the friends of each movie fall with each other, what nice and disobedient chat behaviors they have, equalize and tune the relationships depict in the movies, talk round how the theories of friendship in the caterpillar track textual matter cod to the friendships in the movies, converse nigh how each pic portrays the culture of the characters, and lastly plow what each film says about the talk habits of thei r respective cultures. twain movies have like means by which the characters circulate with each other. In Quayamat Se Quayamat Tak Raj and Reshmi begin their relationship with Reshmi taking pictures of Raj jogging. He notices her taking the pictures and hides, and then he comes up buns her and scares her. When he realizes who was taking the pictures he strikes up a conversation. He apologizes for scaring her and refers to his thoughts by asking, Do you ceaselessly study pictures of tidy sum jogging (Khan, 1988)? In this world-class beset neither of the characters acknowledge their names to each other, as yet Raj asks Reshmi to make full him at the very(prenominal) repoint at the equivalent date the undermentioned day.