Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge

Theories of error ar known as Khyativadas. Kyati means cognition, here(predicate) erroneous cognition. Khyati means erroneous cognition. Error (of when we perceive hard cash in the shell) is regarded as a big issue solely when we are to explain such a perception and are confronted with the thought that is it because of the disapprove itself or our subjective attitude towards it. every way in explaining away any khyati vada, the status of the objective is put in the parameters. The Buddhistic Sunya vadins consider the object to be un documentary. Nothing is significant and the illusory object is no exception. phantasy consists in the unreal appearing as real. When valid indecorum arises, the illusory object is sublated. This may be called Asatkhyati. Because of sublation it is not real. spinal column knowledge? This is difficult to imagine as Nagarjuna had written an finished treatise, Vigrahavyavartani refusing to give any status to pramanas by method of illocuti on. in any event the views of the other schools consider the object of erroneous cognition to be real in some sense. It may be that what is real within as an idea, appears as if without. This is according to the Atma-khyati (apprehension of the cognition(atma) by itself) of the Buddhist Vijnanavadin.

Or it may be that error is due to non-discrimination among two real objects one remembered and the other seen. This is the akhyati of Samkhya. Or, it may the coming into dally here of a thing that is elsewhere, and is cognized through a caliber of extra ordinary perception. This is the anyatha-khyati vada of the Nyaya Vaise sika. Or error may be due to any positive wr! ong knowledge precisely due to a mere negation of non apprehension due to have weakness of the mind of two distinct experiences combined. This is the akhyati professed by the Prabhakara... If you requirement to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper